Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:30:15 +0900 (JST) From: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com> To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: LibreOffice port Message-ID: <20101022.083015.1419128866691342440.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi All, I would like to clarify my points after the Document Foundation is set up: http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=announce&msgNo=429 . I will provide OOo ports as usual. I won't change my stand point. I'll quite when I lost motivation ;-) 1. However, I don't think I'll provide LibreOffice port. It is too tough to maintain too many ports. Still, I spend a lot of time for OOo ports on weekends. Usually, my two Core 2 quad machines are occupied on Saturday or Sunday. To update one of openoffice.org port, it take about 10 hours without porting issue and 1 day if there is any porting issue. I always build a new milestone on i386 and amd64 and provide en and ja packages. cf. http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/packages-8-amd64/ http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/packages-8-i386/ 2. I'm very happy to answer to your questions if you want to make a LO port. I would like to suggest using repocopy to openoffice.org-3 to libreoffice. And do not use ooo-build which I removed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/ooo-build/ even though looks very similar to libreoffice. This was secondary port to openoffice.org-2, (and you may want to use openoffice.org-3) but I'll modify openoffice.org-3 when a new ooo is released. It will affect your LO port as well. 3. I would ask to members to use this ML to discuss LO ports. Currently they are very similar to each other, and until these two ports becomes too far apart. Thanks, -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/ http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101022.083015.1419128866691342440.chat95>