Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:14:40 +0100 From: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 license violation Message-ID: <20071213111440.GG60068@fasolt.home.paeps.cx> In-Reply-To: <20071213110236.GB20039@soaustin.net> References: <slrnflv329.e47.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071213104253.GE60068@fasolt.home.paeps.cx> <20071213110236.GB20039@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-12-13 05:02:36 (-0600), Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > Anyway. How does portmgr feel about this? Aye or nay?
>
> I do not yet believe that it is possible to meet Tuomo's interpretation
> of his license without his prior review of every possible patch, and I'm
> not willing to obligate the FreeBSD project, in perpetuity, to be able
> to do so.
Assuming you have your portmgr hat on, I'll take this as a very clear "nay"
and I won't add the port again.
It's fairly easy to maintain locally in $HOME/bin for those of us who still
feel it's the only usable window manager. :-)
Thanks for the clarification!
- Philip
--
Philip Paeps Please don't Cc me, I am
philip@freebsd.org subscribed to the list.
BOFH Excuse #234:
Someone is broadcasting pygmy packets and the router doesn't know how to
deal with them.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213111440.GG60068>