Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 22:27:25 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <20051004022722.GA64808@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051003221739.Q7983@blues.jpj.net> References: <200510040125.j941PrMr084161@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <20051003221739.Q7983@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:22:17PM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > > linux_base-suse emulators/linux_base-suse-9.2 trevor@FreeBSD.org > > linux_base-suse emulators/linux_base-suse-9.3 trevor@FreeBSD.org >=20 > Both of these are marked RESTRICTED, and the latter is an interactive > port, so is there any value in setting NO_LATEST_LINK here? Do you want to keep getting these reports until the end of time? I wouldn't :-) There's some small value in it anyway..users may create the package links themselves, as long as they don't redistribute them externally. Some organization might have their own package server for internal use with pkg_add -r, for example. Kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDQeiIWry0BWjoQKURAuFwAKDNiCyorl53fTChdwo25s0ZrvOipQCguxfO rOKRCThPfsMULyJgmxyc8bM= =uyrG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051004022722.GA64808>