Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:24:43 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Alexander Churanov" <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> Cc: pav@freebsd.org, Simon Barner <barner@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: STILL OPEN: ports/129226: update devel/boost from 1.34.1 to 1.37 Message-ID: <op.unl235i09aq2h7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0901111038k6b290194k949e43d96a822092@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cb459ed0901091434y3ec4cb5cr56bf358b527515d7@mail.gmail.com> <1231602062.44156.28.camel@hood.oook.cz> <3cb459ed0901101407m2c72487aqf35ea2c81761290e@mail.gmail.com> <1231629954.10829.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <3cb459ed0901111038k6b290194k949e43d96a822092@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:38:10 -0600, Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> > >> >> That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in >> a single system? >> > That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared > libraries, but for header files the suggested solution would require > placing > headers under /usr/local/include/boost-134/boost and modify all ports' > build > processes to include /usr/local/include/boost-134 in a search path. I rather to put only a version and fix the rest port. With that include/boost-134 hack is going to require hack in every port that depend on it. Cheers, Mezz > I'll carry out this experiment. > Another thing I've heard about port versioning is that Gentoo Linux > handles > different versions of the same port installed on a system. Probably, > it's a > good idea to examine how they do that slotting. > Sincerely, > Alexander Churanov -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.unl235i09aq2h7>