Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 01:38:45 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Referencing man pages from ports/ Message-ID: <20011008013845.M21516@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20011008113057.G36543@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:30:57AM %2B0300 References: <20011007214038.E21516@windriver.com> <20011008110956.E36543@sunbay.com> <20011008012121.L21516@windriver.com> <20011008113057.G36543@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:30:57AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Yes. The call will look like this:
>
> .Pxr cvsup 1 net cvsup
>
> And will be rendered like this:
>
> .Xr cvsup 1
> .Pq Pa ports/net/cvsup
This sounds great to me.
What about optional peices of the source tree like the Kerberos
stuff? I'm in favor of creating share/man/man1/kerberos.1 that
explains what Kerberos is and how to install it, and then this would
be overwritten by the real man page if Kerberos is actually installed.
This would fix all the man pages that currently point to the
(non-existant for most people) kerberos(1).
- Murray
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011008013845.M21516>