Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:46:23 +0200
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc:        Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfree86@lists.csociety.org
Subject:   Re: FW: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile Makefile.man pkg-plist  pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 ports/x11/XFree86-4/files patch-2 patch-c  patch-c2 patch-d patch-f patch-i810 patch-j patch-k patch-mouse  patch-r128 patch-r128dri patch-r128xmesa patch-shm
Message-ID:  <3C9619DF.C5691B4B@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20020316235108.GE53073@squall.waterspout.com> <20020318183503.C10603@straylight.oblivion.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:51:08PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> > With this commit, we have XFree86 4.2.0 in our ports tree.
> > Please report problems to me asap.  I am doing a clean checkout
> > on another machine and running another test to catch any mistakes
> > that I might have made at commit time.
> 
> Would it be a very Bad Thing(tm) if the meta-port pulled in
> the Cyrillic fonts, too?  Yes, I do realize that those may
> be installed as easily as a 'make install', or as a pkg_add -r,
> but still - is there a good reason that this is the only font set
> of all those provided in x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font* that is not
> installed by default? :)  I don't think it would take up too much
> disk space or anything, and it would certainly be convenient for
> Slavic FreeBSD users to have it pulled in, too :)

I agree with Peter, especially considering that Cyrillic fonts was
distributed with XFree86 megaport since beginning of the time. We
shouldn't not break POLA.

-Maxim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C9619DF.C5691B4B>