Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:09:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Rajesh Vaidheeswarran <rv@freebsd.org> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: Rajesh Vaidheeswarran <rv@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/cons-test Makefile ports/devel/cons-test/files md5 ports/devel/cons-test/pkg COMMENT DESCR MESSAGE PLIST Message-ID: <200009152009.QAA10133@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> of "Fri, 15 Sep 2000 14:50:47 -0500." <20000915145047.P40658@radon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oh. I'm sorry. I didn't realize that there was a convention for developers' packages. But I'm confused too. When you say $PORTNAME-devel, do you mean that this is the `development' version of the $PORTNAME. If so, this package is different. This is not a development version of cons. It actually is a test bed that cons developers can use to do regression testing of cons whenever they add new features. Does that make the name valid? rv In a previous message, Will Andrews writes: > > Add `cons-test' port. > > > > cons-test is a test bed for cons developers. > > We normally use $PORTNAME-devel or $PORTNAME-current or similar. But > ``cons-test'' is okay. It's too late to change anyway. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009152009.QAA10133>