Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:19:02 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/www/typo3 Makefile distinfo
Message-ID:  <55566889@ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200908182048.n7IKmBai020473@repoman.freebsd.org> (Martin Wilke's message of "Tue\, 18 Aug 2009 20\:48\:11 %2B0000 \(UTC\)")
References:  <200908182048.n7IKmBai020473@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> miwi        2009-08-18 20:48:11 UTC
>
>   FreeBSD ports repository
>
>   Modified files:
>     www/typo3            Makefile distinfo 
>   Log:
>   - Update to 4.2.8
>   
>   PR:             137913
>   Submitted by:   Gerrit Beine <gerrit.beine@gmx.de> (maintainer)

It's good when ports are updated to new versions. ;-)
However this port removes it's configuration files
unconditionally:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/130209

No offence to maintainer/anybody else, I've taken this port
occasionally, but the general question is: what shall we do
with such behaviour? Should we mark them as broken?

-- 
WBR, bsam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55566889>