Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:33:29 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: zfs: the exponential file system from hell Message-ID: <BFAE1DDE-B8F8-40E5-9D9B-CF954D5D6457@mail.turbofuzz.com> In-Reply-To: <20130930234401.GA68360@neutralgood.org> References: <52457A32.2090105@fsn.hu> <77F6465C-4E76-4EE9-88B5-238FFB4E0161@sarenet.es> <20130930234401.GA68360@neutralgood.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:44 PM, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > Bottom line: > The replacement for the 'df' command when using ZFS is 'zfs list'. Given that we have the sources to df, I guess we should consider the = question begged: Do we want to change it to DTRT for zfs filesystems? = There's no Unix Law=99 that says "df(1) must use the output of statfs(2) = directly and can use no longer sources of information!" At the end of the day, df(1) is just a convenient status reporting tool = aimed at human consumption. It could easily reach out to "zfs list" for = the data it prints for zfs volumes if what's reported by statfs(2) just = isn't suitable. - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BFAE1DDE-B8F8-40E5-9D9B-CF954D5D6457>