Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:38:02 +0100
From:      phk@phk.freebsd.dk
To:        Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES src/sys/alpha/conf NOTES src/sys/i386/conf NOTES 
Message-ID:  <69354.1046021882@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:19:33 EST." <20030223121933.D49626@espresso.bsdmike.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030223121933.D49626@espresso.bsdmike.org>, Mike Barcroft writes:
>Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> nyan        2003/02/23 05:32:33 PST
>> 
>>   Modified files:
>>     sys/conf             NOTES 
>>     sys/alpha/conf       NOTES 
>>     sys/i386/conf        NOTES 
>>   Log:
>>   Move MD devices to <machine>/conf/NOTES.
>>   
>>   Revision  Changes    Path
>>   1.148     +187 -0    src/sys/alpha/conf/NOTES
>>   1.1130    +0 -183    src/sys/conf/NOTES
>>   1.1075    +183 -1    src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES
>
>This doesn't look right to me.  If options are shared with at least 2
>architectures they are MI.  We may need quirks so that they don't get
>compiled on PC98, but I think this should be addressed with
>conditionals of some sort.  What happens when we add sparc64 NOTES?
>Do we copy these 183 lines again?

Maybe we need a metafile:

all			option	FOO
pc98,i386,alpha		option	BAR
-alpha			device	GNAF


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-src" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69354.1046021882>