Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 02:07:16 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Guyomarch?= <rguyom@pobox.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can I use keep-state for icmp rules? Message-ID: <20011101020716.F22705@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> In-Reply-To: <20011031144209.A89351@bluenugget.net>; from geniusj@bluenugget.net on Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:42:09PM -0800 References: <009c01c16017$dca045d0$0603a8c0@MIKELT> <20011029153954.B224@gohan.cjclark.org> <005501c1613f$dfb46520$0603a8c0@MIKELT> <20011030164253.C223@gohan.cjclark.org> <000901c1620f$51428530$2801010a@MIKELT> <20011031130817.A246@gohan.cjclark.org> <20011031144209.A89351@bluenugget.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:42:09PM -0800, Jason DiCioccio wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 01:08:17PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > [snip] > > Not sure if checking more "carefully" is an accurate statement, but > > IPFilter does only allow TCP packets that it "expects" back in. It > > does track sequence numbers which ipfw(8) does not track at all. > [snip] > > Now I'm curious. Will using "flags S" after keep state rules in ipfilter > degrade the quality of ipf's stateful inspection? [...] No. The reverse. Btw, s/after/before/g -- Rémi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011101020716.F22705>