Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:53:07 -0700 From: Lorin Lund <wbs@infowest.com> To: beckey <home_post01@yahoo.co.jp> Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Application Message-ID: <43D65B73.7030105@infowest.com> In-Reply-To: <20060124152915.36343.qmail@web3308.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> References: <20060124152915.36343.qmail@web3308.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
beckey wrote: >In FreeBSD, are it that commercial softwares such as Oracle, >VeritasVCS, and LifeKeeper are fewer than that of Linux why? > > >-------------------------------------- >GANBARE! NIPPON! >Yahoo! JAPAN JOC OFFICIAL INTERNET PORTAL SITE PARTNER >http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ganbare-nippon/ >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I would guess that the main reason is that there are more Linux boxes in the world than there are FreeBSD boxes. Secondarily, since FreeBSD has pretty good Linux emulation any package that has been ported to Linux might run on FreeBSD. So there is less motivation/reason to make a native FreeBSD port.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D65B73.7030105>