Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:02:48 +0930 (CST)
From:      Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
To:        sam@wa4phy.async.com (S.W. Drinkard)
Cc:        emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: X required for doscmd?
Message-ID:  <199609090132.LAA26166@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <199609072105.RAA00194@wa4phy.async.com> from "S.W. Drinkard" at Sep 7, 96 05:05:21 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
S.W. Drinkard stands accused of saying:
> 
> Looking at the last few notes about doscmd, I kinda gather that X is
> required for use.  Is that the case, or does it work without X?

X is required for 'fullscreen' emulation.  Alexy just posted some diffs 
that will let you compile doscmd without needing X installed, but bear
in mind that any program that attempts BIOS screen output will die.

> -sam-

-- 
]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au    [[
]] Genesis Software                     genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au   [[
]] High-speed data acquisition and      (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496       [[
]] realtime instrument control          (ph/fax)  +61-8-267-3039        [[
]] Collector of old Unix hardware.      "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick  [[



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609090132.LAA26166>