Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:34:45 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Luciano Musacchio <l0kit0@exactas.org> Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? Message-ID: <86wtosf4gq.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org> (Luciano Musacchio's message of "Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:01:58 %2B0000") References: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luciano Musacchio <l0kit0@exactas.org> writes: > I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :) Stay away from qmail. It has a number of serious problems including non-compliance with Internet standards, poor scalability and poor bounce processing model (the latter makes it ideal as a spam relay / amplifier, especially for email-borne viruses) Do you really want to trust your email to a piece of software that hasn't been updated in seven years, and is distributed under a license that explicitly forbids fixing its many flaws? > Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do > anyone know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail? (i > mean, the latter is far more popular, right?) I doubt it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wtosf4gq.fsf>