Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:34:24 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Oleg Sharoyko <os@sfedu.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong outgoing interface with multiple routing tables Message-ID: <4A6E0F50.1010504@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6E0A8B.5000103@sfedu.ru> References: <1248704237.96833.127.camel@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <4A6DE356.6040006@elischer.org> <4A6DEE30.6000108@sfedu.ru> <4A6DFFA1.1010709@elischer.org> <4A6E0121.2020004@sfedu.ru> <4A6E05EC.8050401@elischer.org> <4A6E0A8B.5000103@sfedu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleg Sharoyko wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> great.. in your simple server, can you do the sockopt on the socket >> AFTER you did the listen()? >> (just as a test). > > Doesn't help. I have also tried to add setsockopt() after accept() (for > a new socket) and in this case the only packet that is being sent out > via wrong interface is the SYN+ACK from server. this is very important. it means I'm not setting the fibnum in the syncache code correctly. > > I'll try to look into the kernel code tomorrow and will report any > findings. > > -- > Oleg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A6E0F50.1010504>