Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 22:04:49 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: "M. Osten" <kulua@reefedge.com> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>, "Michael A. Smith" <msmith@code-fu.com>, freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 500au Message-ID: <20010519220449.J5197@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105151513430.6504-100000@local.localhost>; from kulua@reefedge.com on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:15:45PM -0500 References: <20010514124701.A2926@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105151513430.6504-100000@local.localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:15:45PM -0500, M. Osten wrote: > > That is NOT true. EVERY `a' model I've seen has a Qlogic 1040 SCSI > > controller in it. I am willing to bet someone replaced it with the > > Adaptec controller you have. The motherboard layouts are the same. What > > do you think is different about them? Or are you comparing the MX5 > > models with the GL models? I do know that the `a' models have ATAPI > > CDROM drives vs. the SCSI ones of the `au' models. I believe there are > > also video differences between the two models. > > > Hum...the older PWS had adaptec controllers...hence no srm. I have a > "au" (shipped with NT) and have a IDE cdrom. Wrong. SRM or not has nothing to do with Adaptecs. Adaptecs were shipped with Miatas intended for WinNT. 'au' is for Unix or VMS, not NT. Read HARDWARE.TXT -- | / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: wilko@freebsd.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Powered by FreeBSD/alpha http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010519220449.J5197>