Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 16:02:05 +0100 From: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Change to /sys/net/if.c & /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c Message-ID: <37BD6DEC.179D7D5@baker.ie> References: <26745.935158306@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:55:45 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote: > > > Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?) > > about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps > > we should wait until this has been decided.. ? > > This has nothing to do with the boot messages, though, surely? Sorry, I meant kernel messages in general (of which boot messages are a part of) Basically the discussion was suggesting different levels of verbosity for the kernel as a whole, one level would be the bare mininum (ie. errors, warnings etc.) another level might include informational and another might include debug etc.. Of course as the saying goes: "Nothing works in practice like a good theory." :P Cillian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37BD6DEC.179D7D5>