Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:44:06 -0500 From: "Craig Reyenga" <creyenga@connectmail.carleton.ca> To: "Keith Jones" <freebsd.dev@blueyonder.co.uk> Cc: <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.0 RC3 now available Message-ID: <008901c2bc3f$f9d9b070$0200000a@sewer.org> References: <004101c2bc33$69323fd0$0200000a@sewer.org> <3E24B87B.3000709@blueyonder.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
These mentioned licensing issues make sense, however I still think that there should be some sort of system to ensure big and/or popular packages to make it to CD #1. -Craig > > One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of > > packages is a > > little odd. Many small packages and ones that are not popular seem to make > > it on the first CD, while bigger and/or more popular ones are stuck being > > fetched+built manually after. This can be a pain on slower computers, > > especially with ports such as mozilla and openoffice. I guess what I am > > suggesting is that more attention be paid to _which_ ports make in onto CD > > #1. > > > Doesn't OpenOffice.Org require the Sun JDK? If so, might that be a bit > of a problem due to licensing restrictions? > > I wouldn't see a problem with Mozilla, though. Except that it is quite, > quite bloated. ;) > > Keith > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?008901c2bc3f$f9d9b070$0200000a>