Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:46:35 -0500 From: Stephen Hilton <nospam@hiltonbsd.com> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ack! SYSTEMTYPE=WIN32 Message-ID: <20031002104635.15b8eabe.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0310020640530.44406-100000@s1.stradamotorsports.com> References: <20031001120445.1aaf62c4.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0310020640530.44406-100000@s1.stradamotorsports.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:45:06 -0700 (PDT) "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Stephen Hilton wrote: > > > Jason, > > > > Seems like I fell for this at some point or another :) > > > > Do you actually use kerberised telnet with ROT_13 as the > > encryption for the telnet session after authentication ? > > > > Is such a combination possible (not in theory :) > > I don't know that MIT Kerberos has such an encryption type. It does have > encryption types that it warns against using. No. I do not use ROT_13 to > encrypt my telnet sessions. > > Congratulations to Dag-Erling who's powers of observation snuffed me out. > I never expected anyone to bite on my little ruse, but once someone did I > decided it was OK to have a little fun with it by playing dumb. Well I certainly have to say that FreeBSD is one of the best "learning" vehicles that I have ever been exposed to <:) Cheers, Stephen Hilton nospam@hiltonbsd.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031002104635.15b8eabe.nospam>