Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Jan 2003 00:40:59 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/security/mac_lomac mac_lomac.c
Message-ID:  <20030108003756.I8502-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030107002755.A45957@espresso.q9media.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote:

> Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> writes:
> > Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > > Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > > mux         2003/01/06 04:07:38 PST
> > > >
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     sys/security/mac_lomac mac_lomac.c
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   Fix warnings on 64bits architectures.
> > > >
> > > >   Noticed by:     alpha tinderbox
> > > >
> > > >   Revision  Changes    Path
> > > >   1.7       +1 -2      src/sys/security/mac_lomac/mac_lomac.c
> > >
> > > Doesn't this just cause signed/unsigned warnings further down when
> > > buflen needs to be a size_t for comparison with sizeof()?
> >
> > No, it doesn't, we don't have warnings for signed/unsigned problems
> > enabled.

Er, we should have these warnings further down [the time axis] when the
warnings are enabled.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030108003756.I8502-100000>