Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:49:37 +0000 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, FreeBSD-Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Matthew Fleming <mdf356@gmail.com>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@telenix.org> Subject: Re: getting a list of open files versus PID nos.? Message-ID: <AANLkTin=DkOJ8oafoGcQNZxWZ50P8533PmkSgPLmT%2BgU@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D0020D7.5080706@freebsd.org> References: <4D000448.1050606@telenix.org> <AANLkTinssm_1rPZ-pPbpGKghDbQfDx29y-y8e-NRSJHo@mail.gmail.com> <20101208230139.2097c2e8@core.draftnet> <AANLkTi==WtuJgCD7mAEJHgRer-cnzYbVyEEWAkfcsXrd@mail.gmail.com> <4D0020D7.5080706@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 December 2010 00:20, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 09/12/2010 01:47 Matthew Fleming said the following: > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:54:57 -0800 > >> Matthew Fleming <mdf356@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> This is what lsof is for. I believe there's one in ports, but I have > >>> never tried it. > >> > >> Is there any advantage to using lsof instead of fstat(1) (fstat -p pid)? > > > > I believe that lsof reports on all open files by all processes, > > whereas fstat will only report on a specific provided pid. > > Just try running fstat without any options. > Or procstat -a -f. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > not sure if dtrace is ready for it on freebsd yet, but it certainly can do it on solaris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin=DkOJ8oafoGcQNZxWZ50P8533PmkSgPLmT%2BgU>