Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:39:30 -0600
From:      "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To:        "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org, ivoras@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: When will ZFS become stable?
Message-ID:  <790a9fff0801090939r3d464892l95606e83e2d0459e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <861w8sp44p.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <200801081758.m08HwlOg076161@lurza.secnetix.de> <861w8sp44p.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/8/08, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> writes:
> > How about including the URL of the ZFS tuning guide in the
> > warning message:
> >
> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
> >
> > It contains all the necessary information for both i386 and
> > amd64 machines.
>
> Actually, it fails to mention the most important bit: vfs.zfs.arc_max,
> which allows you to restrict the amount of memory used by ZFS to
> something comfortably smaller than vm.kmem_size.
>
It was in the ZFS tunning guide, but was removed in revision 20.
Doesn't say why the change was made.

Scot



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0801090939r3d464892l95606e83e2d0459e>