Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 06:54:53 -0800 From: Tom Skeren <tms3@fsklaw.com> To: Tom Farrell <tom@mvcg.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihome routing help Message-ID: <4200E9BD.1020008@fsklaw.com> In-Reply-To: <000801c508d4$aa7dd770$6501a8c0@neonduron> References: <000801c508d4$aa7dd770$6501a8c0@neonduron>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Farrell wrote: >BSD 5.0 3 Nic cards. > >Card 1 connects to DSL network and assigned route able IP from the > ISP > >Card 2 connects to a private frame-relay network and is assigned > 192.168.66.2/22 directly connected interface is 192.168.66.1/22 > >Card 3 connects lan is assigned 192.168.67.0/24 > >I have enabled Nat & ipfw on card1 and clients on Lan can use the DSL connection perfectly. > >I can source traceroute the directly connected 192.168.66.1 sourcing 192.168.66.2 interface. I cannot source traceroute to 192.168.66.1 when sourcing from 192.168.67.1. > >Based on this it does not appear that forwarding is happening between the two networks, 192.168.66.0/24 & 192.168.67.0/24 ? Seems the only reason that the traffic is passing through is because of the Natd & ipfw divert statments... > > add a static route on the Nat machine. route add 192.168.66.0 192.168.66.1/24 >Can this be done with routing or do I have to use ipfw to forward between both networks? I would prefer just to run the nat & ipfw instance on the DSL interface and run pure routing between the lan interface & the interface which connects to the frame-relay network.. > >thnx in advance > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4200E9BD.1020008>