Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:19:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ENOUGH! [Re: Nontrivial brokeness with new threads.] Message-ID: <20040225021938.GA60991@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <p06002000bc61b2f7827e@[10.0.1.2]> References: <16443.35905.455147.330275@canoe.dclg.ca> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402241254480.29298-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <16443.39996.156614.885761@canoe.dclg.ca> <200402242318.20080.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> <403BE11A.2070609@freebsd.org> <p06002000bc61b2f7827e@[10.0.1.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:08:10AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 4:41 PM -0700 2004/02/24, Scott Long wrote: >=20 > > Please be more respectful to people asking these kinds of questions. >=20 > The problem here is that Daniel's initial response to David's=20 > question was fine, but David's reply was snide and=20 > passive-aggressive. Daniel responding in kind is not unexpected.=20 > David should have fully read the threads that he was referring to,=20 > and not been so flippant in the first place. Who cares, let's all just shut up and code :) Kris --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAPAY6Wry0BWjoQKURAkYKAJ0XqyI/FQh+XQP5/ubBZI0nne04PACgtkBD w2wa+f5VKec2SUDT6ze+Luw= =d+JF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040225021938.GA60991>