Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:19:29 +0100
From:      Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
To:        "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
Subject:   Re: libgnomevfs2 (2.10) and KDE apps
Message-ID:  <200503171019.29957.freebsd@redesjm.local>
In-Reply-To: <opsnrmozep9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References:  <200503170242.25222.freebsd@redesjm.local> <opsnrmozep9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Jueves, 17 de Marzo de 2005 05:56, Jeremy Messenger escribi=F3:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:42:24 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez
>
> <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > <snip/>
>
> gnome-menus doesn't provide any option to enable/disable like what
> gnomevfs2 used to have. I am not going to work on to break the
> 'standard' installation of gnome-menus, so send us the patch if you
> do really want to have the KDE menu disable. When you create patch,
> be sure to keep KDE menu enable by default.
>

My problems are, in general, related to the presence=20
of /usr/local/share/ in some paths.  I don't know of any gnome bits=20
under /usr/local/share.

> > I think that, if a gnome user need a kde app (very rare case), he
> > may use the same env to include /usr/local/share/ or what he needs
> > of special.
>
> Disagree, this is even more nasty. If GNOME 2.10 has menu editors
> then the things will be difference, because any users can remove KDE
> menu. It is easier to remove than that 'env' stuff.
>

I think that gnome init do some scan on that paths and an auto config,=20
but you may know more than I about that. The env thing has solved my=20
problems now.

=2D-
  josemi
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> > --
> >   josemi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503171019.29957.freebsd>