Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:34:21 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Michael Doyle <itmngr@cooperationireland.org> Cc: David Banning <david+dated+1202587312.e4b61b@skytracker.ca>, tundra@tundraware.com, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: question on DSL signal Message-ID: <20080205123337.V2621@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <0B902504-5804-4D5E-B807-3295CE3E5633@cooperationireland.org> References: <20080204200151.GA16540@skytracker.ca> <47A78854.701@tundraware.com> <0B902504-5804-4D5E-B807-3295CE3E5633@cooperationireland.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> available only in large > urban areas, but where they are available, I have found them to be more > reliable than DSL. only with point-to-point case, and only if local law doesn't work the way to prevent this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080205123337.V2621>