Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:04:47 GMT From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: bin/78021: sem_open(3) doesn't mention fnctl.h include requirement Message-ID: <200502241404.j1OE4l3j016916@fledge.watson.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200502241410.j1OEARTM056826@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 78021 >Category: bin >Synopsis: sem_open(3) doesn't mention fnctl.h include requirement >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Feb 24 14:10:27 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Robert Watson >Release: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE i386 >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x >Description: sem_open(3) identifies semaphore.h as an include requirement for sem_open(); however, sem_open()'s oflag argument can take on values of O_CREAT or O_EXCL, which are defined in fcntl.h. >How-To-Repeat: #include <err.h> #include <semaphore.h> ... if (sem_open(name, O_CREAT, 0) < 0) err(-1, "sem_open: %s", name); ... >Fix: The fix is either to document the include dependency, or remove it, perhaps via a nested include. I don't know which is the right one from a standards perspective. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502241404.j1OE4l3j016916>