Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:31:49 -0500 From: Gerard <gerard@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? Message-ID: <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.// Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:27 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 >=20 > jest first step to criminalize unix at all No really. This case involved an individual who was accessing and acquiring information using falsified credentials for an apparent nefarious purpose. If you have a key making machine, does that give you the right to make a key to my home and then enter it without my permission? It is not the 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what the individual did with it. If this individual believed what he was purported to by doing was legal and above board, then why did he openly commit perjury and use falsified credentials? Quite frankly, it is criminals like him who cause other lawful individuals problems. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Using TSO is like kicking a dead whale down the beach. S. C. Johnson --Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.// Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeWKIYACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMmZYQCgmTEbjSOMjxTACEMhOBYK4ZKs Y9MAniWp0ibwKVk0TIbsN7WkRLKQkDff =nd/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.//--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080122123149.05837a85>