Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:36:20 -0500 (EST)
From:      Lanny Baron <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.COM>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, opentrax@email.com, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freedom@FreedomTC.COM
Subject:   Re: enough already -->accessing portal site
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011141224580.62920-100000@satan.freebsdsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <200011141659.JAA21802@usr08.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
For the last and final time, the reason for sending the mail with the word
"disgusting" to Intel, was that to me, it was disgusting that it appeard
that Intel had gone the M$ way in terms of accessing M$'s site(s). I had
told numerous call centers about the problem with the inabilatiy to access
sites within Intel. 

None of the other mail was cc'd to advocacy.

It was the last mail, in which "disgusting" was used (and I still maintain
it was used rightly, and was warranted) and cc'd to advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG,
that I had only .. underline ONLY, had the intent of showing the advocacy
community that as a commited person in the sense of using FreeBSD as the
focal point of our business, that people on the list would see someone
taking an active role in getting the site at Intel to be able to be used
by other browsers and for people like myself who will not be forced to use
I.E.

The next step is to try to get audio/video software makers to make code
for FreeBSD so that courses offered by various companies such as, Intel's
certification programs, do not have to use Windows to use online learning
tracks.

Please end this constant mailing about the portal site. It's a shame that
one cannot be like a top notch lawyer (very strong in cross
examination) and then cc it to advocacy.

Once again, I did not occur to me that my mail would construe to anyone
that I was trying to get Intel to think that they would receive tons of
mail from the FreeBSD community.  

Lanny
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Terry Lambert in the last wild and more than
exciting...:

> > Greg, what are you trying to do to me??? Are you trying to get people to
> > hate me? I have spent almost 1 year trying to make business plans for
> > Freedom Technologies Corporation, which exists, and sells FREEDOM
> > SERVERS with FreeBSD installed.
> 
> No, he's just trying to get you to stop sending email that have the appearance
> of collusion with the FreeBSD Project.  If you want to send a "heads up" to
> a FreeBSD mailing list, use BCC so the person or company you're sending the
> mail to will not misconstrue your message as coming from or being approved by
> the FreeBSD Project or the Advocacy group.

I always see these types of postings from the corporate perspective
as a threat of a "call to arms" to mobilize a large group of some
unknown vitriolic bent.

As such, seeing the Cc: can be an incredibly effective tool, if it
is used correctly.

That said, I suspect that if there is intent to use the advocacy
address as a truncheon to get your way, that it would be best if it
were a padded truncheon: polite, with no rancor.

I rather expect that Intel reacted as it did to avoid getting
"slashdotted" by a bunch of advocacy lunatics (promptly, and with
a higher level than might otherwise be expected management
response, and with rapidly implemented changes to the site, not
just "lip service").

I personally have no objection to the list being used as a mild
threat/lever in order to get a result that one might not otherwise
be able to get, using simply a private note to the webmaster, who
probably gets hundreds of such things each day, and files them in
his/her /dev/null folder.

But next time, let's pad that whiffle-bat.

PS: Setting a "Reply-To:" would take care of most of the concerns
about them getting SPAMmed with a bunch of responses in the context
of a list.  Probably a better idea would be a list whose sole intent
is to be used as a lever with vendors, but that would probably not
be approved by The Powers That Be, for the same reasons they object
to using advocacy that way in the first place.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011141224580.62920-100000>