Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 22:29:09 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Cc: freebsd-git <freebsd-git@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Git Repository Bundles Message-ID: <CACNAnaH8j2bxPEwBs6ib615ziutJD7ssCQua3XbsLdB-pG9Jhw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <62d00eff81d5595acfe7a8bafd8b97e8@bsdforge.com> References: <CACNAnaG2cwC_TYV5Trv2ss6ePp8nFd=efTXdDd%2B8UnL8cNYaVQ@mail.gmail.com> <62d00eff81d5595acfe7a8bafd8b97e8@bsdforge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:41 AM Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> wrote: > > On 2020-12-29 23:14, Kyle Evans wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Just an FYI- I spent a little bit of time tonight hacking up a system > > much like what Linux does[0], generating bundles of our repos for > > folks on unstable connections and whatnot. > > > > I'm currently publishing these bundles to freefall until I get yelled > > at or until it's replaced by some official service, you can find them > > at [1]. > > > > All repos are scheduled to update at 03:30 UTC on Mondays, and all > > branches are included. Good instructions on example use can also be > > found at [0]. > We've been providing a cpan mirror for years now (rsync && https). > I'm happy to accommodate FreeBSD in any way I can. I already host a > bunch of the source for ports I maintain. So I mirrored your bundles > on the same host. Speaking of ports, I also went one further, and > added a distinfo style file for each of the bundles > > https://BSDforge.com/bundles/ > > 265955836 Dec 29 23:01 doc.bundle > 140 Dec 30 08:15 doc.bundle.sha256 > 1586758704 Dec 29 23:01 ports.bundle > 145 Dec 30 08:16 ports.bundle.sha256 > 1282394200 Dec 29 22:51 src.bundle > 141 Dec 30 08:17 src.bundle.sha256 > > # less ./src.bundle.sha256 > > TIMESTAMP = 1609345023 > SHA256 (src.bundle) = > fcab5c72ffd86c6f0e843d8fe0a406ad062a444a0ed1824e93c0500b32971a62 > SIZE (src.bundle) = 1282394200 > > problems? please report them to the email address this message arrives from. > :-) > Oh, cool, thanks! I went ahead and partially incorporated this -- the original is now populated with less-complete sha256/sha512 checksums to match the established convention for re@ snapshots at least. I like the idea of also reporting the timestamp/size, but I didn't quite have time/energy to hack that in tonight (it's a quick-and-dirty lua script).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaH8j2bxPEwBs6ib615ziutJD7ssCQua3XbsLdB-pG9Jhw>