Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:34:05 +0600 (ALMT) From: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Pat Lashley <patl@phoenix.volant.org>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of nullfs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102231732190.12941-100000@lion.butya.kz> In-Reply-To: <200102230549.WAA09447@usr05.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Terry, please check your facts. This has been recently fixed. See the > > VOP_GETVOBJECT() stuff. The trick though is to get it MFC'ed into > > 4.x... > > Cool; I was unaware that this had been done. This was even the > approach I advocated from a casual look at it on the CVS web. > Last I had heard of this, people were still advocating alias > objects. > > Things like this should really be talked about on the -FS list, > don't you think? Well, they was and I'm recall that you even replied to my post :) See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=0+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-fs/20000910.freebsd-fs for start of the thread. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0102231732190.12941-100000>