Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:56:51 -0600
From:      Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com>
To:        patrick <gibblertron@gmail.com>, "FreeBSD Questions Mailing List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Which version of BIND to use on FreeBSD 6.1?
Message-ID:  <6.0.0.22.2.20070103165540.024c9558@mail.computinginnovations.com>
In-Reply-To: <b043a4850701031241k5186c20fr78a14d2a588d3cdc@mail.gmail.co m>
References:  <b043a4850701031241k5186c20fr78a14d2a588d3cdc@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am using the default 9.X that is installed with 6.1.  The only problems I 
have had is that startup options changed and required another define in 
rc.conf.

         -Derek


At 02:41 PM 1/3/2007, patrick wrote:
>I'm trying to figure out which is the best version of BIND to use on
>FreeBSD 6.1? I've always stuck with FreeBSD's base version, and since
>upgrading from FreeBSD 4.x to 6.1, that meant moving from BIND 8.3.x
>to 9.3.2. I've encountered numerous problems since moving to 9.3.2
>which primarily revolve around exponential increases in memory and CPU
>usage.
>
>On our BIND 8.3.x setup, we have 750 master domains. Memory usage is
>just shy of 70MBs. On our new server with BIND 9.3.2, we have
>currently 140 master domains, and memory usage continually grows until
>FreeBSD cuts it off. I have discovered the "max-cache-size" option
>which allows me set an upper limit, but when the named process hits
>that limit, it starts eating up all available CPU cycles. I've seen
>some similar reports from other users, but haven't found any real
>solutions.
>
>While browsing the ports tree, I found I have my pick of BIND 8.3.x,
>8.4.x, and a ports version of 9.3.x (not sure exactly how this differs
>from base -- more current?). Our needs are fairly basic -- we have a
>few DNS servers, and each are masters and slaves, helping one another
>out. We're not using DNSSEC or anything. I'm wondering what other
>people are generally using, and which version works best for them?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Patrick
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.2.20070103165540.024c9558>