Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:19:26 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update - better EDMA RX support, testing AR9580 Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomWF2bL5xJT6WVdzjYwtkuPS=6ruO=7iRb5XaGF5rYXXg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <514A73C8.7050102@gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=UZDCb%2BeSRLO5fiJQNJkzVYqjcy4zWNc70CBePQyKGjw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=MZXU3qdOHmv99Hq-XRZCCphw-O_M8Tv=T7srE=apq%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <514A73C8.7050102@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I have no plans to backport this to stable, sorry. :( Adrian On 20 March 2013 19:43, Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/19/2013 10:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> On 19 March 2013 12:39, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've just committed some new RX handling code. Since the RX FIFO on >>> the AR9380 and later chips is very shallow (128 entries), you have to >>> refill the FIFO much quicker than you can handle frames. >> >> >> .. and an AR9390 STA -> AR9380 AP at MCS24 is giving me around 230mbit >> TCP. >> >> My goal is to hit 200mbit TCP on 2x2 and 300mbit TCP on 3x3. >> >> But, I won't complain about getting to 230mbit this early in the game. >> >> >> >> Adrian > > > Any tips for backporting the code to -STABLE? Currently I had to comment > out the scsi cd driver because it was causing kernel panics. Now I'm getting > kernel panics from geom_io.c due to a failed assert. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomWF2bL5xJT6WVdzjYwtkuPS=6ruO=7iRb5XaGF5rYXXg>