Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: dave <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade and index Message-ID: <20041130035734.GA36416@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <000501c4d68f$74a82320$0400a8c0@satellite> References: <000501c4d68f$74a82320$0400a8c0@satellite>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current ports. > I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes much > faster. My problem is whenever i do a make search for a port the index.5 > file is regenerated and that takes an extremely long time. I was wondering > if this is normal behavior, and what if anything i could do to speed it up? make fetchindex Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBq++uWry0BWjoQKURAiggAJ4sXrfCeUpeP5Es3wLPJXSuYSbuiACeK6M/ KI22LVfAu4EgLjAXQSmOMTs= =QPHm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041130035734.GA36416>