Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:24:29 +0100
From:      Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Subject:   Re: REINPLACE vs. perl -i; and why ports are too complex for their own good
Message-ID:  <200402122224.33190.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040212122617.T88889@qbhto.arg>
References:  <200402110716.i1B7GH9D017803@repoman.freebsd.org> <xzplln8k3fp.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040212122617.T88889@qbhto.arg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Boundary-02=_Q8+KAC00SHTYpEe
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 12 February 2004 21:41, Doug Barton wrote:
> Now, years later, we are STILL arguing about this topic,

And the argument has become even more ridiculous. Please, no bikeshedding o=
ver=20
this one again, _please_. I find the whole "oh my god, ports don't do stuff=
=20
on $ancient_version_of_freebsd" whine to be totally pointless. Ports is NOT=
=20
the base-system, ports are not and cannot be supposed to meet any=20
stable-branch criteria.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--Boundary-02=_Q8+KAC00SHTYpEe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAK+8QXhc68WspdLARAsJYAJ4yUEhLhl9MczRbUTx+CAe4kNcbuACfU4xw
Qklj2MWhXzcVZ5vH9EtLaB0=
=sU2V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_Q8+KAC00SHTYpEe--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402122224.33190.michaelnottebrock>