Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:51:26 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching schedulers (Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default) Message-ID: <4EEBBD5E.50603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1350C7A0-BE58-4C34-804A-A6A3C1C61761@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <1350C7A0-BE58-4C34-804A-A6A3C1C61761@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote: > Adrian Chadd said: > > >> Hi all, >> >> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time? >> >> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at >> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting? >> >> That may be an acceptable solution for now. > > As Luigi explained, the problem is not to have code for both > schedulers residing in the kernel, the problem is to migrate > processes from one scheduler to the other. I think dynamically switching schedulers on a running system and loading one or the other at boot time are different problems, are they not? Doug -- [^L] Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EEBBD5E.50603>