Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:09:50 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> Cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Any objections to the following? Message-ID: <200411121909.iACJ9o5t093134@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <E6821B92-34DC-11D9-893C-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> References: <E6821B92-34DC-11D9-893C-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:58:54 -0800, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> said: > This allows: > rm -rf "" > To behave the same as: > rm -f "" > Which is to say that no diagnostic will be emitted if you're forcing > the operation (and ignoring errors). According to the Standard, only [ENOENT] diagnostics should be suppressed. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411121909.iACJ9o5t093134>