Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:33:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Rosengart <ben@skunk.org> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> Cc: Doug <Doug@gorean.org>, Dominic Mitchell <Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907291633170.74639-100000@penelope.skunk.org> In-Reply-To: <19990729210425.A21377@pavilion.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote: > Ok - but it's a bit misleading having both values in /etc/services.. > > Shouldn't be: > http 80/tcp www www-http #World Wide Web HTTP > http 80/udp www www-http #World Wide Web HTTP > > Should be: > http 80/tcp www www-http #World Wide Web HTTP > http 80/udp #[not used] > > Don't you think? At least that way you don't have to read all of the > rfcs to construct a firewall ;). And the output of netstat (trafshow, etc.) would be considerably easier to read. -- Ben UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907291633170.74639-100000>