Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:02:13 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@bsdclub.org>, Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ tree frozen (was Re: HEADS UP for /usr/src/release/doc & /usr/doc) Message-ID: <20010611230213.A47504@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200106111842.f5BIgRB13547@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:42:27AM -0700 References: <20010611060725.A4531@nagual.pp.ru> <01061113044201.36820@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <20010611161221.C34164@nagual.pp.ru> <200106111337.f5BDbCE30451@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> <20010611175041.A35687@nagual.pp.ru> <200106111551.f5BFpWE30649@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> <20010611201531.A38114@nagual.pp.ru> <200106111645.f5BGjNA08546@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010611211953.A39062@nagual.pp.ru> <200106111842.f5BIgRB13547@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:42:27 -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > >=20 > > Immediate MFC is against our policy, isn't?=3D20 >=20 > So is immediate breakage. Yes, but fixed. It seems that people forget that every big change means some period to settle down. > RELNOTESng is broken for RELENG_4. I would have warned you about the=20 > possibility of this, if you'd bothered to ask first. How exactly it is broken? I didn't touch a bit of RELNOTES on -stable. > It looks like the easiest way out of this will be to follow your new > names policy on the RELENG_4 branch (at least for doc/ and src/release/ > doc/). This will involve a repo-copy at the least, but I've never seen > a repo-copy done for files on a branch. Please *don't* do this. Let I not understand well what you try to say exactly. The things flow was: 1) Repo-copy for src/release/doc was done by Peter. 2) I apply corresponding rename to -current branch. 3) I have no opinion is it must be done in -stable too or not. Personally I not plan to touch those bits in -stable in any case, so they remain as is and can't be broken as you say unless I miss some technical details you not explain. --=20 Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBOyUVteJgpPLZnQjrAQEADQP/fkfZeVKE3O1G/jAxo0QAah0lbYIIunz9 Ly+cNstcZu3PT8MQVNQqAu+vLgJjRpkulEZ25252Drto9nOyxffVIxHOa2X4Ae55 tV/LlEq/nldr3Mou+4/ch+leULXisbe9/Q8buLERJ3jwkus60joiN+knkA0Jz9IC kw0y7zCFrQI= =Fwj5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010611230213.A47504>