Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:56:28 -0400
From:      James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: nuking "unsafe" protocols (was Re: Upcoming rc.conf changes not  loading certain currently loaded daemons)
Message-ID:  <39A59A0C.7588265E@thehousleys.net>
References:  <251BF6012D6B4A49A4109B1C3289A7B5BB78@purgatory.jumpweb.com> <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
blaine wrote:
> Umm,  why not just use openbsd if security is the primary concern?
> 
Why shouldn't we provide the best level of security possible, using
OpenBSD as a target?

Jim
-- 
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39A59A0C.7588265E>