Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:51:52 +0100 From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org> To: "Frank J. Laszlo" <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> Cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91911: [PATCH]: x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2: distfile unfetchable Message-ID: <20060210205152.5e69de68.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43EC86B4.6060600@vonostingroup.com> References: <200602081940.k18Je7uC012039@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060209202602.1449abba.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> <20060210101931.k017bqbpus8gosws@netchild.homeip.net> <43EC86B4.6060600@vonostingroup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Fri__10_Feb_2006_20_51_52_+0100_AlzI8Zp7rx6FmOne Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:27:32 -0500 "Frank J. Laszlo" <laszlof@vonostingroup.com> wrote: > > But I don't think we need to rush this out before the ports freeze. It= =20 > > would > > be enough to commit the ARCH-shuffling part to the acroread port and=20 > > let the > > RELEASEs ship with it. After the ports freeze it could then be fixed=20 > > properly > > without time pressure. >=20 > acroread7 will not build for most people on amd64. I think this is a=20 > pretty darn good reason to rush the fixes out. Clearly. And acroread7 is not the only affected port. I don't intend to add the silly ARCH rewriting to my own linux ports, for instance. --=20 Jean-Yves Lefort jylefort@FreeBSD.org http://lefort.be.eu.org/ --Signature=_Fri__10_Feb_2006_20_51_52_+0100_AlzI8Zp7rx6FmOne Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD7O7YyzD7UaO4AGoRArCBAJ0f16Dy4mHPVybZTqMMtTHNRixxGACdH3XE 3IPZVeebuhYRchoWXmsKXk0= =lrMr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__10_Feb_2006_20_51_52_+0100_AlzI8Zp7rx6FmOne--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060210205152.5e69de68.jylefort>