Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 16:36:52 +0300 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> To: obrien@nuxi.com Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-gnu@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/c++ Makefile Message-ID: <199803081336.QAA00559@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Mar 1998 05:01:11 PST." <19980308050111.59862@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David E. O'Brien" wrote: > > Digital Unix does this as well. IMHO it's bogus, but it does have a > > pretty substantial precedent. 8( > > As does Sun, HP, AT&T (cfront). Thus most of the commerical Unix's call > their C++ compiler by ``CC''. None of the ones I looked at had ``c++''. Yes. CC is a good name for vendor-supplied C++ compiler, and it is better to left 'c++' and 'g++' to GNU :-). So, the next step is to update sys.mk. > > > > Modified files: > > > > gnu/usr.bin/cc/c++ Makefile > > > > Log: > > > > add `CC' as a link to `c++' for compatablity with SGI. Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803081336.QAA00559>