Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:39:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org>
Cc:        Freebsd Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309241626140.7454-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030924171949.GA90989@wombat.localnet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:

> * Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> [030924 12:03]:
> > In message <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309241029001.26896-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>, Daniel
> >  Eischen writes:
> > >On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> > >> PTHREAD_LIBS is a great tool for the /usr/ports mechanism, but doesn't
> > >> mean anything outside of that.
> > >
> > >That just meant it makes it easier to maintain ports so that
> > >they are PTHREAD_LIBS compliant (they would break when linked).
> > >I know it has no bearing on 3rd party stuff.
> > 
> > Just to throw one further approach out on the table, below is a
> > patch that makes gcc read from a file to determine what library to
> > associate with the -pthread flag. It's a hack of course, and probably
> > neither correct or optimal. If you want to make -pthread mean libkse,
> > create an /etc/pthread.libs that looks like:
> 
> I was looking through gcc last night to see how conceptually difficult
> it would be to do something like this.  But instead of a file, I was
> thinking of this process:
> 
> * if env("PTHREADS_LIBS") then LDFLAGS += PTHREADS_LIBS
> * elseif fileexists("libpthread") then LDFLAGS += -lpthread
> * elseif fileexists("libthr") then LDFLAGS += -lthr
> * elseif fileexists("libc_r") then LDFLAGS += -lc_r
> * else error("Threading not supported.")

Out of all the suggestions (aside from making -pthread a NOOP),
this is my favorite one.  I would also make -pthread a NOOP
when building shared && dynamic.

I plan on changing thread library compatibility for FreeBSD
6.0, though.  So it might be wise just to add a different
compiler switch for libthr or libc_r.

-- 
Dan Eischen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10309241626140.7454-100000>