Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:56:22 +0200
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        Joe <joeb_722@comclark.com>
Cc:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Janne Snabb <snabb@epipe.com>
Subject:   Re: [new port] usage of shar command
Message-ID:  <4C46EE76.10206@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C465E14.1060300@comclark.com>
References:  <4C42CFDA.3040409@comclark.com>	<4C42D292.208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4C4388D2.30200@comclark.com>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1007190216290.9805@tiktik.epipe.com>	<20100720190602.GA32624@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1007201343310.1689@qbhto.arg> <4C465E14.1060300@comclark.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21/07/2010 04:40, Joe wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>>> The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
>>> (and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
>>> difficult to distinguish from quotes.
>>>
>>> Rather than write "`find port_dir` (note the backticks)", IMO, it is
>>> far easier to write $(find port_dir) - which is syntactically the
>>> same but visually more obvious.
>>
>> That's a fair point. Do you think that the text as it currently exists
>> is sufficiently clear, or do you think that it still needs the
>> modification you're suggesting? I'm happy to make the change (or
>> someone else can if they so desire) if that's what people thing is the
>> right way to go.
>>
>>
>> Doug
>>
> The text as its currently exists is a long way from being clear to a
> first timer. And I am talking about the new change that just went in.
> 
> "shar `find port_dir` (note the backticks)",
> 
> or
> 
> "shar $(find port_dir)"

This one doesn't work in (t)csh, the backticks do.

> both address the problem nicely.
> 
> By all means go and make the correction.

Object!


Regards

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C46EE76.10206>