Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:21:15 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c src/sy Message-ID: <20000616102115.Z8523@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <200006160506.XAA28743@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 11:06:48PM -0600 References: <39499E16.9FE731F7@newsguy.com> <XFMail.000616132841.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200006160506.XAA28743@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 11:06:48PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > Correct. If we want performance, how about removing the difference > between kernel and userland. Why have the overhead of the kernel > vs. userland change, since it causes us to take a big performance hit. > > As long as we're at it, we may as well embed all of the video drivers in > the kernel, like NT did. X should become an embedded part of the > system, since that will also speed up performance again. > > There are *LOTS* of performance improvments that can be done. Since > FreeBSD is used on the internet, let's embed telnet and ftp in the > kernel as well. We could certainly blow away all benchmarks that people > see. So basically if you don't have any constructive to contribute to the specific case at hand, you can just make broad assinine statements? -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000616102115.Z8523>