Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:30:07 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 ifnet.9 Message-ID: <200409171230.11280.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20040917102406.GB62675@cell.sick.ru> References: <200409170649.i8H6nhlH067676@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040917102406.GB62675@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart17668708.zKnlDaSFQE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 17 September 2004 12:24, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 06:49:43AM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > B> Modified files: > B> share/man/man9 ifnet.9 > B> Log: > B> Document the struct if_data members ifi_datalen, ifi_epoch, and > B> ifi_link_state. > > What does policy say about to-be-done fields which are already present > in struct? Do they need to be documented? I mean if_carp field. if_carp is a placeholder right now (I hope I did comment that in the header= ?)=20 so I don't think it must go to the manpage already. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart17668708.zKnlDaSFQE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBSryzXyyEoT62BG0RAsD5AJ9RPGAWNqSzzE3rQF6yKLhE0qgUeACfY4JF HsXqTDO7j5Lcma6M/uAgezs= =VTcJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart17668708.zKnlDaSFQE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409171230.11280.max>