Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:40:45 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Vulpes Velox <kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: gcc 3.3.1
Message-ID:  <20030921024044.GB40126@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030920174627.742be97b.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com>
References:  <20030920174627.742be97b.kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:46:27PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> Do I have any thing to worry about upgrading versions of gcc, from ports, in
> stable?

Depends what your intentions are.  You can use it to compile your own
code, and most ports, but some ports and the FreeBSD 4.x base system
cannot be compiled with gcc 3.x.

Kris

--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/bQ+gWry0BWjoQKURAsYfAJ4rvMjoH3O5DkiRA/orjQbicbeLkgCeMOrC
IoYf3w3SDMPUkN+30XjG7p8=
=ILq+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921024044.GB40126>