Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:17:00 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/i386/conf NOT Message-ID: <20000628091700.W275@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200006271755.KAA01724@john.baldwin.cx>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 10:55:03AM -0700 References: <20000627091227.K275@fw.wintelcom.net> <200006271755.KAA01724@john.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> [000628 01:11] wrote: > > On 27-Jun-00 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> [000627 04:43] wrote: > >> Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> > two accept filters are provided, one that returns sockets when data > >> > arrives the other when an http request is completed (doesn't work > >> > with 0.9 requests) > >> > >> ...which means it doesn't work except as proof of concept. > > > > Show me a browser that only issues 0.9 requests and I'll show you > > a browser that wouldn't grok the html on my page even if it did > > respond to 0.9. > > Your home page doesn't determine the standards for HTTP. :-P > > For one thing, if I manually telnet to a host, I'm much more likely > to use a 0.9 request than a 1.0 one because it's fewer characters > to type. Why would anyone use telnet? What if you want to test the > web server on a machine over a remote login connection and don't > have lynx or w3m installed for some reason or another? > 'telnet foo 80\nGET /\n' is easy to type. Which won't work when there's vhosting going on. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000628091700.W275>