Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:22:50 -0600 From: Chad David <davidc@issci.ca> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: two make questions Message-ID: <20021001152250.GA7580@colnta.acns.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20021001085833.GD30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> References: <20020923133431.GZ30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20021001085833.GD30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:58:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > I need to run my newly created Makefiles on one sorry RedHat box, and > the pmake package just doesn't cut it. So, since I couldn't find any > other rpm on redhat.com, what are my chances should I, say, want to use > /usr/ports/Mk/* on Linux? (Not that this is actually the case, my > Makefiles are pretty simple.) > One of the projects I'm working on is a build system much like FreeBSD's and instead of restricting our features we simply ported pmake from FreeBSD. The Solaris port took me about 10 minutes, while the win32 port was a little more involved (it would be easier without fork() :)), so I doubt a RH port will be difficult (I hesitate to even call it a port). You can either keep your makefiles very simple (good luck!), or you can port pmake and just move the whole system over. Good luck. -- Chad David davidc@acns.ab.ca www.FreeBSD.org davidc@freebsd.org ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021001152250.GA7580>