Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Jul 1999 12:27:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Korvus [PINE]" <korvus@tasam.com>
To:        Andrew Fremantle <starslab@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Networking
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907071215410.4575-100000@tasam.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990707160202.3037.rocketmail@web220.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help



> 
> 1) I have accumulated a large amount of experience with the Linux
> implementation of NAT, a kernel-land trick they call "IP Masquerade".
> I am aware that FreeBSD, and presumably the other BSDs offer similar
> functionality in the form of a user-land "NATd". I need to know if it
> is as functional as the Linux implmentation? The Linux implementation
> has "helper" modules for troublesome protocols such as ftp, irc, icq,
> even Quake (I do HalfLife though :). Will these work across a BSD box
> doing NAT?

I believe so, though I am not familliar with the Linux implementations and
I just started using NATd today (though I have been told that it works
flawlessly with a number of protocals).
 
> 2) This one is a bit lengthy, involves ASCII artwork, and is
> network-general, though I hope it will apply to FreeBSD or any free
> 'nix.
> 
> 10BaseT Ethernet
> 
>          A (WinNT)
>            |
> ADSL  --- HUB --- B (Win95)
>            |
>          C (whatever)
> 
> All the machines in this scenario pull IP off a DHCP server over the
> ADSL.
> 
> Transfers from any local machines, such as A sending a file to B
> cause the ADSL modem to go nutzo. The transfer is also very slow (by
> ethernet standards). Just pull the ethernet wire from the ADSL modem
> and it speeds up DRAMATICALLY. I am looking at putting a 'nix box on
> this network, and if I can make it act as a switch* between the ADSL
> modem and the rest of the network, than so much the better. The only
> "switch" I have seen or have experience with is a 3Com SuperStack ][
> (I think), which is more than a little bit out of my budget. Can
> anyone suggest a cheap piece of network hardware or a 'nix OS that
> can do this?
>  
> * I understand a "switch" to be a device that examines the MAC
> address of machines on the network, and only passes packets on to
> another interface if such is necessary. This would mean packets from
> A to B don't need to go over the modem, and would not.
> 

With a FreeBSD (or any unix) system, you can configure it as a router if
you put 2 NICs in it, which will provide the functionality you require.
Once again, I am only vaguely familliar with the concept so you should
check www.freebsd.org for info.  Here's a start:
http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ161.html



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907071215410.4575-100000>